This posting was inspired by Annette (aka Crowned Regal)'s most recent
blog post about name calling. This particular posting strikes a nerve, I'm sure, with many of us. Even though this may be considered a duplicate posting, I recognize that not everyone reads the postings in the discussion forums, but many of you read my blog postings, so I am posting my response here too. I also encourage everyone who reads my blog to follow the link and join in the discussion on the forum as well.
I've never been fond of nicknames. I got called so many horrible names when I was growing up, like Baldy, Wiggy, Wiggy Longstocking, Kojak, Picard, Cue Ball, Chia Pet (because of the wig), etc. that I don't like to be called anything other than my name. My boyfriends and men that I have dated have all learned not to call me any endearments or pet names other than the ones that I allow, which are none. YoKasta or Kasta is just fine. (Of course, a couple of my friends here on AW call me Kat, and I'm not quite sure where that one comes from, but I'm cool with that one too.) But call me anything else, and I'm like a Vietnam vet having a flashback -- it's just not pretty.
Bottom line: I don't WANT you to make reference to my AA, because I am NOT defined by it. That's like making up a pet name for a quadriplegic based upon their disability or a nickname for an amputee -- it's just wrong and downright offensive. My name is YoKasta Montonique Martinez, aka Kasta or Kat or Kastababy -- and that is IT. Call me anything else other than that, and there will be some consequences and repercussions. End of story.
I'm not a politically correct person, and I'm not trying to be -- so if you want to use the adjective bald to describe me, then go ahead -- it's what I am. But don't use crap like "follicularly challenged" or "vertically challenged" to describe me as being short, because the whole PC bit is a load of BS anyway. Save it for someone with nothing else to worry about.
William Shakespeare said in
Romeo and Juliet, "What's in a name? A rose by any other name would smell as sweet." I would have to respectfully yet vehemently disagree with that statement. I understand the context in which that statement was made, and perhaps that is true in some cases, but not in the case of how to refer to an alopecian, and the use of nicknames or other adjectives. I think that a rose is still a rose, no matter how you try to refer to it, so just call it a rose and be done with it.
What do you think??
You need to be a member of Alopecia World to add comments!
Join Alopecia World